Doctrine 7 of 10 · tianzhi
The Standard Above天志
Our affirmation
There is an objective standard of right, above any ruler's whim.
我有天志,譬若轮人之有规,匠人之有矩。
I hold the will of Heaven as a wheelwright holds his compass and a carpenter his square.
— Mozi, 天志上
In practice
A Mohist tests every rule, including the Community's own, against one measure: does it promote what benefits the world and remove what harms it?
Mozi said he held "the will of Heaven" (天志, tianzhi) the way a wheelwright holds a compass and a carpenter a square. A compass takes the question "is this round?" out of the hands of whoever talks loudest: put the compass to it and the answer is plain.
That is the place of 天志 in Mozi's system: a measure that belongs to no one. In his time, right and wrong were whatever the Son of Heaven and the lords said they were. Mozi wanted a standard higher than the Son of Heaven, so that even he could be measured. He found it in Heaven. And what does Heaven want? "Heaven desires what is right and hates what is wrong," and what is right is impartial care and mutual benefit: promoting what benefits the world and removing what harms it.
墨门 is a secular community. We ask no one to believe in Heaven or spirits, and no one to disbelieve. What we take from 天志 is its structure, not its cosmology: there is an objective standard of right, and it stands above the will of any person in power. A thing is right not because the 鉅子 says so, not because a majority votes so, but because it survives the test: does it increase people's welfare and reduce their suffering?
That standard binds 墨门 itself. The Handbook can be amended and the 鉅子 can be removed, but the measure "promote what benefits the world, remove what harms it" is never put away.
In practice at 墨门
- Every rule meets the measure. Each rule in the Handbook, when made or amended, must answer one question: whose welfare does it increase, whose suffering does it reduce? A rule with no answer does not pass.
- The three tests are how the measure is applied. 本之: what does past experience say? 原之: what do people see with their own eyes now? 用之: what happens when it is put into practice? A rule has to stand up in all three directions.
- The 鉅子 is under the measure too. The 鉅子's job is to carry out the Handbook and preside over the 兼爱大会. There is no privilege of interpreting doctrine. What the 鉅子 says faces the three tests like anything any Mohist says.
- Power does not decide right. A chapter majority decides what we do; it does not decide what is right. That is the reason written dissent exists: a majority can be wrong, and the measure does not bend because it is outvoted.
- A history lesson, not a creed. In the weekly reading we study the three 天志 chapters and discuss why Mozi needed a standard above the emperor and what it is still good for. We read for history and logic, not dogma.
Mozi held up one measure against the arbitrary power of an entire age. What we inherit is not the name of that measure but the conviction that there must be one.